Strong welfare states protect workers against economic vulnerability through generous unemployment benefits and training programs" (Beckfield, 2006). The expansion of markets to the regional level from the national level-should increase income inequality as workers are exposed to the wage competition of a larger labor pool, but this effect may be dampened or even reversed at very high levels of regional economic integration, because those economies are stabilized by strong welfare states and corporatist institutions (Beckfield, 2006).
It appears that this phenomenon of income inequality has begun to level off in recent years. Firebaugh (2007) was among the first to note that income inequality for the world as a whole levelled off in the last decades of the 20th century, after rising for more than two centuries. While global income inequality is immense, it has continued to be fairly steady or has even declined somewhat in recent years. This is thought to be due to brisk income growth in certain areas of the world. Firebaugh's findings disputed earlier claims that global income inequality continues to rise quickly. According to Firebaugh (2007), "those claims are flawed because each country is looked at as if they were equal, despite vast differences in population and size. When populous countries are given their due weight, the data show that global income inequality has not gone up sharply, and most likely is not rising at all."
In most things in the business world Marx's inequality can be seen as an underlying theme. Most people who work for a company have a boss to whom they must answer to on a daily business. This inherent power imbalance often creates alienation just as Marx suggests. When one person...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now